Why isn’t Russia doing more to jam GPS in Ukraine?

Russian forces have been consistently jamming alerts from the U.S. World wide Positioning System as component of its war on Ukraine. These alerts underlie several facets of contemporary warfare, from navigating surveillance drones and concentrating on missiles to enabling mobile radios.

The great importance of GPS as a armed forces software was underscored by Kremlin media in November as troops had been massing alongside the Ukraine border. Soon after Russia shown it could demolish a satellite in space, a tv commentator regarded to be an unofficial mouthpiece of President Vladimir Putin stated the country could “blind NATO” by capturing down all GPS satellites.

Regardless of this, Russian interference with GPS in Ukraine has not been practically as aggressive as several observers had expected.

Professionals inside the GPS/positioning, navigation, and timing communities have proposed a selection of feasible motives for this. Listed here are the most commonplace, all of which are primarily based completely on publicly readily available data:

Russia’s electronic warfare capability isn’t as excellent as it was believed to be. Russian forces have a fearsome standing when it arrives to digital warfare. And they go out of their way to enhance this. At one point, the state-owned information agency Sputnik proclaimed Russian EW abilities “render aircraft carriers useless.”

The common knowledge is that they have developed and managed this ability as a reaction to top-quality know-how employed by Western forces. Digital warfare can be an cheap way to degree the playing subject.

Considering the fact that Russian forces have been remarkably less able than envisioned in other elements of the Ukraine conflict, some think this might be true with their potential to interfere with GPS.

Most observers price cut this recommendation, even though.

They place out that Russian forces on a regular basis jam GPS alerts in northern Norway from areas significantly throughout the border. And that in some conditions this jamming has been so exact, signals in a close by frequency band from Russia’s GLONASS satellite navigation technique have been unaffected.

Russia has obviously demonstrated impressive skills to spoof GPS in excess of extensive parts. Consumers in downtown Moscow normally find their devices falsely reporting they are at an airport. The exact is real in many coastal regions, the Black Sea and other locations the place senior govt officers are to be identified.

A 2016 Moscow Times headline study “The Kremlin eats GPS for Breakfast.” The typical consensus in the community is that there has been a good deal of evidence to help that assert.

The query is then, why is the Kremlin only nibbling at GPS in Ukraine?

Russian forces use and need GPS. Proponents of this idea issue to downed Russian fighter jets found to have GPS receivers taped to their dashboards.

Signals from Russia’s GLONASS system and terrestrial Chayka electronic navigation procedure are both equally accessible for use in Ukraine. Nevertheless it appears to be possible there not ample suitable receivers for these techniques to equip all Russian forces. As the world’s 1st world navigation satellite system, GPS receivers have turn out to be the two abundant and low-cost. Inexpensive GPS receivers and some duct tape appears like an interim alternative for some inadequately equipped Russians.

Also, GPS signals assistance a wide assortment of infrastructure. Telecommunications, the online, electrical grids and equipment-command programs all depend on GPS for timing. Russian forces might would like to guard Ukraine’s infrastructure for their individual reward and use. Prolonged and widespread attacks on GPS indicators could result in really serious infrastructure troubles with extensive-phrase strategic downsides greater than any short-term tactical gains.

Large-electrical power, persistent GPS jammers are simply specific. Any robust and constant radio frequency transmission can be quickly situated and attacked. Numerous militaries have missiles specifically developed to property in on and wipe out jamming transmitters. Even without having these kinds of weapons, way-getting technological know-how can pinpoint a transmitter enabling an artillery attack or an air or floor assault. Russian commanders could be limiting transmission power and time on air to prevent attracting hostile fireplace.

Ukraine is considerably less impacted. Though Ukraine is increasingly obtaining and working with much more Western weapons, a lot of of which use GPS, it also has huge stockpiles of Soviet-era weapons. These never rely on GPS and are probable unaffected by most, if not all, forms of electronic warfare. Also, Ukrainian typical and irregular forces are probable much less reliant on refined command, handle and communications techniques utilized by bigger militaries. So, GPS jamming that could hamper usual functions for the U.S. and NATO may have fewer impression in Ukraine.

Conserving the finest to use from the U.S. and NATO. Despite the spot of the conflict, Ukraine is not the enemy Vladimir Putin is truly nervous about. His considerations concentrate on the U.S. and NATO. Deploying Russia’s most refined and powerful electronic weapons in Ukraine would enable adversaries to study technologies and strategies. This would direct to the development of countermeasures and make the weapons much less successful in potential conflicts.

Superior for Russia to hold its best equipment and methods for interfering with GPS in reserve, for use afterwards towards more substantial forces and a lot more significant targets.

Dana Goward is president of the Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation and serves on the U.S. Countrywide Room-Centered Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Advisory Board.

Have an feeling?

This short article is an Op-Ed and as these, the thoughts expressed are people of the authors. If you would like to reply, or have an editorial of your possess you would like to submit, be sure to email C4ISRNET Senior Handling Editor Cary O’Reilly.

Want extra perspectives like this despatched straight to you? Subscribe to get our Commentary & Viewpoint publication once a week.